Thursday, September 1, 2011

The Sad State of Educational Research

After four years of digging into the digital native/net generation/millennial learner rhetoric, I have come to a distressing conclusion. The main culprits in promoting and perpetuating the unfounded claims and stereotypes are not just the pundits and commentators who started this ball rolling but educational researchers who have accepted and repeated these claims without subjecting them to the critical scrutiny you would expect.

So what we have is a process that begins with somebody making an unfounded claim that has resonance and at first glance seems to make sense (young people have been exposed to digital technology from birth so they must technologically fluent and educators need to respond this). Educators then repeat this claim and begin to frame research according to this unfounded perspective. Other researchers then cite the research of their colleagues which is based on these unfounded claims and pretty soon the original unfounded claims have been virtually accepted as self-evident truths.

This was brought to light quite vividly as I read the newly-published article, PowerPoint and Learning Theories: Reaching Out to the Millennials by Karen Gardner and Jolanta Aleksejuniene. Their study attempted to map student preferences for Power Point styles with Cognitive Load, Multimedia and Visual Learning Theories. Nothing wrong with this except their rationale was couched in the now discredited and unfounded millennial learner discourse: As millennials, today’s students are independent, inclusive (move between global and virtual communities), opinionated and aware, investigative (use technology), and expect immediacy (information at light speed) (Lippincott, 2010)… There is a developing awareness that millennial students consider technology central to communication. As we continue to introduce technology into our teaching and learning, it behooves us to make this form of communication as effective as possible.”

I thought I had read almost everything that had been written on this issue but I wasn’t familiar with the author that Gardner and Aleksejuniene cited to support their claim: Lippincott.  So before I jumped to conclusions I thought I should check the Lippincott article (Informationcommons: Meeting millennials, needs. Journalof Library Administration, 50(1), 27-37) to see if she had conducted some research that supported this claim or at least cited some research I was not aware of. What I found was more of the same. No original research but rather the repetition of the unfounded claims made by the usual sources like Prensky, Palfrey & Gasser and Oblinger & Oblinger to support her conclusion that this generation has distinctive learning styles, is fluent with digital technology, and is able to multitask efficiently. Based on this she concludes: “libraries need to understand the style of their net generation students to provide environments conducive to engagement and learning; these include how libraries present access to their collections and licensed materials, how they instruct students, how they promote services, and how they configure their spaces.” But what about all the research that debunks the millennial myth? No problem, Lippincott dismisses that in one line: “Although some believe that the characterization of an entire generation constitutes a stereotype or is just plain erroneous, others accept that there are some common ways in which many of this current generation of students are different from those who came before." So research isn’t about investigation and critical analysis it’s just about choosing which perspective you like. Some say this, others say that. I think I’ll go with this one.

In summary, we have a house of cards. Research informed by unfounded claims based on other unfounded claims. If we want educational research to be taken seriously, we need to do better.


Zanne said...

In my evaluation of a recently attended Educause webinar, I suggested webinars where voices like yours, Larry Cuban, Kraschen and Ravitch had some air time.

It's time to unlock the discursive straight-jacket and let everyone's voice out.

Alex Usher said...

Nice post. You may be interested in some work that we did in Canada, which asked students how they felt about e-learning resources in classes. For the most part, they were pretty unimpressed. See: .

brindhaajay said...

This information is impressive.
I am inspired with your post writing style & how continuously you describe this topic.
JAVA Training in Chennai
Selenium Training in Chennai
core Java training in chennai
Best JAVA Training in Chennai
selenium training in velachery
selenium training in tambaram
advanced java training in chennai
selenium training in tambaram

Anoushka Sakthi said...

Impressed in your way of writing. Thanks for the update.

SEO Training in Chennai
JAVA Training in Chennai
Big Data Training in Chennai
Selenium Training in Chennai
German Classes in chennai
DOT NET Training in Chennai
web designing course in chennai
web designing course in OMR
Web Development Training in chennai

Aruna Ram said...

Excellent article! These are content very unique and I hope more different kinds of ideas in this title. your explanation method is super and this is a good job. well done...!
Embedded System Course Chennai
Embedded Course in chennai
Embedded Courses in chennai
Excel Training in Chennai
Corporate Training in Chennai
Pega Training in Chennai
Oracle DBA Training in Chennai
Embedded System Course Chennai
Embedded Training in Chennai

Vicky Ram said...

Thanks for sharing this valuable information to our vision. You have posted a worthy blog keep sharing.


sathyaramesh said...

Thanks for splitting your comprehension with us. It’s really useful to me & I hope it helps the people who in need of this vital information.
CCNA Course in Chennai
CCNA Training in Chennai
Angularjs Training in Chennai
AWS Training in Chennai
Big Data Analytics Courses in Chennai
CCNA Training in OMR
CCNA Training in Velachery

monu said...

Thank you for excellent article.Great information for new guy like antimalware service executable